Saturday, April 24, 2010


First Drive Review: 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor


Posted by Mike Levine
August 23, 2009
Author’s note: We covered the Raptor’s technical and design elements in great detail in our first look at Ford’s one-of-a-kind, high-speed off-roader. We encourage you to read that story for reference, along with this review of what it’s like to pilot the Raptor.



Somewhere in a safe-deposit box in Michigan, I imagine there must be video of Ford’s senior lawyers caught after-hours dressed as chickens, playing Twister and singing bad karaoke to Barry Manilow’s greatest hits. Holding the only two keys to the locker must be Ford’s Special Vehicle Team engineers and F-Series marketing gurus, who have patiently waited until now, when they’ve finally leveraged that footage to win the legal department’s buy-in to build and sell what is arguably the most daring and radical pickup to come from that company (or any other high-volume auto manufacturer) in the past decade: the 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor. In a world where we have to acknowledge a 5,000 word legal agreement to use “Sweet Home Alabama” as a ring tone, Ford shows a 360-degree view of the Raptor catching air over the desert on its consumer website. The off-road pickup named after dinosaurs, eagles and fighter jets isn’t going to let a few attorneys get in its way.



With Raptors now reaching driveways, there’s likely only one group of people happier right now than Ford’s lawyers watching the video of their poultry-imitating exploits being destroyed, and that’s the folks who’ve just bought one. How do we know? After more than a year and a half of waiting, we’ve finally driven the truck ourselves.







Ford hosted the media’s first drive of the Raptor in Anza-Borrego State Park, near San Diego. What the Rubicon Trail is to Jeeps, Borrego is to the Raptor. It’s where the truck was engineered and tested to meet some of the toughest desert off-road conditions in the world.



The Raptor has to walk a very fine line. It combines a hardcore Fox Racing long-travel suspension -- which until now has only been available in similar configurations as an expensive retrofit kit for hardcore off-roaders -- with the F-150’s confident on-road manners and its trailer-towing, cargo-hauling, work-truck reputation. All this is available for what we consider to be a smoking deal: $38,995 for the 5.4-liter V-8 version we drove.



The Raptor certainly looks the part of the desert-racing bandit. It’s only available as a SuperCab with a 5.5-foot bed. Its Coke-bottle layout is a perfect case of form following function to cover the truck’s track, which is almost 7 inches wider than a typical F-150 for extra stability off-road. It includes all-new sheet metal from the A-pillar forward, including the hood, fenders, bumper and a massive grille with “Ford” boldly stamped across its width. The rounded outer portions of the Raptor’s cargo box are unique, too; only the cab’s doors and roof are carryover. Whether it’s parked on the street or perched on rocks, the Raptor’s hyperkinetic and predatory looks are like no other pickup, and its unique, legally mandated roof and side LED marker lamps make sure the Raptor will be recognized day or night over long distances.







The Raptor’s interior is also unique. The instrument cluster features SVT and Raptor badges. The front leather and cloth captain’s chairs are split by a console that houses a set of four auxiliary switches (two 30-amp, one 20-amp, one 10-amp) borrowed from the Super Duty. They’re pre-wired for aftermarket accessories, like lights, a winch or an air compressor. The console also hosts buttons that activate hill descent control and off-road mode. An integrated trailer-brake controller is mounted in the dash. Optional body-color accents liven up the interior when the truck is at rest while backseat passengers are sure to appreciate the large headrests when the truck is pounding the turf off-road.



On-Road Impressions



It’s hard to imagine that a truck with the Raptor’s bulldog stance and purpose-built, high-speed off-road hardware could handle as well as it did when we drove on pavement.



The current Ford F-150 lineup has received kudos for solid steering feel that inspires confidence in the truck’s towing and hauling capabilities, but SVT has given the Raptor its own unique steering calibration that replaces slow and steady progressiveness with extra boost for livelier feel. The rack-and-pinion setup easily overcomes sluggishness expected from the Raptor’s wider front stance and helps mask understeer to a moderate degree when negotiating twisty roads. There was very little body roll. However, the Raptor’s uniquely tuned steering can’t make up for occasional road chop that’s communicated directly to the driver’s hands from the stiff high-speed valve tuning of the internal bypass shocks that’s optimized for surfaces that give instead of defects in hard asphalt.







If you still associate “SVT” with the old supercharged Ford SVT Lightning F-150 high-performance street pickup, getting the 5,800 pound Raptor up to speed on the road may require some patience. The three-valve, 310-horsepower, 365-pounds-feet-of-torque 5.4-liter V-8 took 8.8 seconds to go from zero to 60 mph in two-wheel drive, according to instrumented testing with the VBOX we brought along. That’s with the truck’s launch-optimized 4.10 rear axle, though that low final-drive ratio is somewhat negated by the Raptor’s very tall 35-inch tires.



Winning traffic light races isn’t the reason you buy a Raptor, but if power is a priority you might want to consider purchasing a Raptor with the 5.4-liter engine and adding a proven Roush supercharger. The truck will certainly benefit from the extra 90 or so horsepower that Ford’s new naturally aspirated 400 hp / 400 lbs.-ft. of torque 6.2-liter premium V-8 will offer when it becomes available by February 2010, for an extra $3,000.







Driving through diverse urban conditions, we found that the Raptor’s 6R80 six-speed automatic transmission hunted for the right gear more often than the same gearbox in other 2009-10 Ford F-150s. SVT reps on hand said the Raptor’s default street-mode shift logic is optimized for fuel economy to help the truck meet its 14/18 mpg city/highway fuel-economy rating. Our solution was to use tow/haul mode to force the Raptor’s transmission to hold its gears longer, instead of downshifting at the earliest opportunity to save fuel and upshifting soon after to add power or gain momentum. Tow/haul mode made for a much livelier and involved driving experience, with the added bonus of immediate downshifts on descents if we tapped the brake pedal once.



Several times when we came to a full stop we noticed a minor nose-to-tail rocking motion. The driveline felt like it might be binding, but SVT vehicle dynamics engineer Gene Martindale, who’s been driving the Raptor hard both on- and off-road since the first test trucks were cobbled together, said the Raptor’s special engine mounts and long-travel suspension were responsible.



We quickly became big fans of the F-150’s updated brakes, which are standard across the 2010 lineup, including the Raptor. The only difference is that the Raptor has a larger ABS pump to help keep the brakes cool during long, steep grades off-road when the new hill descent control feature is needed for long periods. The new brakes have very predictable and firm stopping feel, with minimal fade and ABS intrusion.







As we entered Anza-Borrego State Park after about 80 miles of stop-and-go urban traffic and curving country roads, the most frustrating portions of the drive gave way to long, straight stretches of undulating highway with varying wavelengths and amplitudes that brought back memories of what it felt like to bomb across the desert as a passenger in the Raptor last fall. The Raptor firmly hunkered down and soaked up everything we could throw at it at any speed across this tamed ribbon of rolling desert terrain until we reached our destination for the first day.



What we learned: The Raptor lives to run in the desert, but it also works well as a daily driver.



Off-Road Impressions



The next morning we departed for the off-road portion of the test. Ford setup base camp at Devil’s Slide near Ocotillo Wells, Calif. The off-road driving was split into two segments: a two-mile hilly loop through deep sand and over rocks to check out the Raptor’s nimbleness over technical terrain, and a 22-mile high-speed lap through Borrego’s dry washes.







The technical loop started out with a several-hundred-yard sprint through deep sand in four-wheel-drive High range, with the rear electronic locker engaged to help us power through sticky spots. Mashing on the accelerator, we effortlessly drifted the Raptor left and right as we kicked up rooster tails sailing across the dune. The power curve of the 5.4-liter V-8 was predictable and steady, as it applied power until the Raptor’s electronic nannies cut throttle when our steering input was digitally deemed too aggressive compared with the truck’s forward momentum and yaw rates. Deep sand, however, offered up another case where the 5.4-liter Raptor could use a bit more punch.



In 4Hi we climbed several rocky outcroppings as we drove around a series of small peaks above the scrub brush of the desert floor. The weathered granite offered a great surface to the Raptor’s tires, and the truck had no problem beating these challenges. At points where there were deep ruts on one side of the truck, we were able to use the Raptor’s excellent articulation to keep all four wheels in contact with the ground in most conditions. There was hardly any frame-scraping, though we also weren’t dealing with shifting rocks and small boulders. Steering felt very precise, with just the right amount of bump stop feedback from the terrain to tell us what we were crossing when we couldn’t see it fully or without the aid of a spotter. The Raptor’s wide track helped overcome its relatively long wheelbase.







The Raptor is the first Ford-brand vehicle to offer hill descent control. It uses the truck’s antilock braking system to automatically modulate the brakes to slow travel down steep slopes so the driver can focus on steering and it helps make up for the Raptor's relatively mild 45.1:1 crawl ratio. Having driven trucks that were equipped with similar systems, from the expensive Lexus LX 570 to the reasonably-priced Nissan Frontier, Ford’s HDC is the best we’ve driven to date. The ABS modulations were smooth and unobtrusive, leaving our attention to focus on staying on the best line down the grade. It was easy to scrub speed or add velocity in 1 mph increments with a touch of the brakes or accelerator.



The final portion of the technical loop was down a very steep 125-foot hill. The HDC was flawless in slowing down the 5,860-pound Raptor -- we didn’t have to apply the brakes once. The truck simply walked itself down the hill while we were along for the ride.



With the hills behind us, of all the driving we did, we most looked forward to piloting the Raptor in a high-speed desert loop. If you’re a kid who grew up in the 1980s watching “Dukes of Hazard” and dropping quarters on Ivan Stewart’s off-road arcade game, the Raptor is the ticket to making some of the daydreams you had then become reality.







We set the truck in 4Hi and activated its unique off-road mode, which changes the engine’s throttle map, leaving the butterfly valve fully open when pushing the accelerator down through its entire arc. That’s intended to give it linear throttle response, like a race truck, instead of high power at the beginning that’s tapered at the end, like a street truck. Off-Road Mode also changes the transmission’s shift points to hold its gear and not upshift after letting off the throttle at high speeds. It also locks out the sixth gear overdrive at the top of the transmission to keep rpm high. Brake behavior is also modified. At low speeds over deformable surfaces, like sand, it virtually disables ABS to allow full brake lockup so you can stop as quickly as possible to avoid hitting or traveling over an obstacle. But if you’re in a wash at high speeds, ABS kicks in much the same as it would in a street truck until you reach lower speeds, where full brake lockup can occur.



In the first few miles through Borrego’s dry creek beds, we kept our speed to only about 30 to 40 mph. It gave us a chance to earn our Raptor legs. What was most amazing about the first few miles -- and what quickly became expected behavior -- was how well-mannered the truck was while crossing washboard terrain that would have cracked our skulls on the roof of an ordinary half-ton. The triple internal bypass Fox Shocks are monsters with huge appetites for soaking up desert whoops and washboards. The Raptor’s awesome bolstered seats held us in place and damped most of the remaining reverberations that made it past the suspension into the cabin.



As familiarity with the truck grew, we started to notice how well the LT315/70R17 BFGoodrich All-Terrain tires augmented the suspension. Around sandy banked turns in the wash, the tires bit into the loose surface to keep the truck on the track our eyes were focused on. The Raptor easily slid across the sand – but only when we wanted it to. Steering feel again played a major role, allowing us to easily power-slide the truck at will and quickly recover as we learned where the Raptor couldn’t break the laws of physics.







The Raptor we drove through the wash was optionally equipped with Ford’s navigation system. Its huge screen and excellent graphics make it our top choice in the half-ton segment. Although we were off the grid, the screen still showed us a helpful breadcrumb trail to follow as we ran the circuit.



Having ridden in the third seat of SCORE Baja full-size stock race trucks outfitted with professional-grade suspension and electronics systems, it’s amazing to think just how similar a factory Raptor is to one of those very expensive -- and temperamental -- beasts. Just five years ago, it probably would have been impossible to build a truck like the Raptor that’s as close as it is in capability to the professional sleds that race Baja.



What we learned: You’ll probably see the Raptor running at high speeds through the desert -- we topped out at 75 mph -- but for a vehicle its size it’s surprisingly nimble and capable crawling up and down at low speeds over technical terrain, too. Our biggest gripe is that it needs extra grab handles for the driver and passengers.



Summary



The Raptor doesn’t have the low-speed rock-crawling focus of the Dodge Ram Power Wagon or Hummer H3T, and the 5.4-liter version may not be powerful enough for some, but the Raptor’s overall versatility in the dirt is as close to perfection as you’re going to get if you want to take your off-road recreation to the next level and still retain livable work truck capability without adding a second mortgage to your home.







The Raptor’s sophisticated on- and off-road driving modes and hill descent control allow the driver to expertly dial-in the truck’s performance to fit their unique skill level. It’s a truck that will grow with the driver as they hone their off-road skills and it will provide an excellent platform to build on when the time comes to start swapping out hardware. We fully expect the aftermarket is going to love the Raptor.



The bottom line: The Raptor can do things we didn’t think were possible in a factory pickup. We don’t really know or care how it was given the OK by Ford’s attorneys. The fact is, it’s available now and it’s virtually perfect for the application for which it’s built. We’re just happy Ford’s legal eagles must like their Raptor as much as we do.







2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor Specs



Base price: $38,995

Engine: 5.4-liter V-8

Valvetrain: SOHC, three valves per cylinder

Horsepower: 310 @ 5,000 rpm (gas) / 320 @ 5,000 rpm (E85)

Torque (pounds-feet): 365 @ 3,500 rpm (gas) / 390 @ 3,500rpm (E85)

Transmission: Six-speed automatic

Axle ratio: 4.10

Suspension (f/r): Unequal-length control arms, coilover shocks/single-stage leaf spring, piggyback reservoir shocks

Steering: Power rack and pinion

Brakes (f/r): 13.78-inch vented discs / 13.7-inch vented discs

Wheels/tires: Cast-aluminum 17x8.5-inch/LT315/70R17 BFGoodrich All-Terrain

Wheelbase (in.): 133.1

Length (in.): 222.1

Width (in.): 86.6

Height (in.): 78.4

Track (in.): 73.6

Curb weight (lb.): 5,860

Maximum towing (lb.): 6,000

Ground clearance (in.): 9.8

Approach (deg.): 29.8

Departure (deg.): 26.1

Breakover (deg): 20.8

Crawl Ratio: 45.1:1

Maximum towing capacity (lb.): 6,000

Fuel capacity (gal.): 26.0

EPA mileage estimates (mpg): 14/18 city/highway

Seating capacity: 5




Thank you,
Thomas Ieracitano
Thomas@Ieracitano.com
http://digitalcarguy.com/
(229) 251-2462
P.S. Are you 'Advertising' or 'Marketing' ?
Ask me the Difference?

Friday, April 23, 2010

What if you went car shopping based on your occupation or profession

What if you went car shopping based on your occupation or profession?

+ Firefighters: A Chevy Blazer
+ Entomologist: Mitsubishi Spyder
+ Meteorologist: Honda Element or Buick Tornado
+ Astronomer: Mitsubishi Eclipse
+ Optometrist: Ford Focus
+ Ornithologist: Ford Falcon
+ Prison Guard: Ford Escape
+ Lawyer: Honda Civic
+ Housekeeper: Plymouth
+ Mountain Climber: Chevy Avalanche
+ Fortune Teller: Saturn Aura
+ Marathon Contestant: Toyota 4Runner
+ Foreigner/Traveler: Hyundai Accent

And what would historical figures drive? What about celebrity cars?

+ Dawg The Bounty Hunter: Mercury Tracer
+ Cruella: Cadillac Deville
+ Picasso: Nissan Cube
+ Jacques Cousteau: Plymouth Barracuda
+ Clint Eastwood: Dodge Magnum
+ Carl Sagan: Mercury Comet
+ Bruce Jenner: AMC Javelin
+ Stephen Hawking: Smart Car
+ Michael Phelps: Ford Freestyle
+ Neo: Toyota Matrix
+ Courtney Cox: Mercury Cougar
+ Dizzie Gillespie: Dodge Coronet
+ Thomas Edison: Chevy Volt
+ Arnold Schwarzenegger: Ford Flex
+ Ben Franklin: Jeep Liberty
+ Christopher Columbus: Ford Explorer
+ Daniel Boone: Mercury Mountaineer
+ Greek poet Homer: Honda Odyssey
+ King Arthur: Excalibur Phaeton
+ Vern Troyer: Mini Cooper
+ Jesus: Any Model from "Christler" - Maybe an Accord
+ The Edge: Ford Edge
+ Turtle: Hyundai Entourage
+ Tiger Woods: Buick Rendevous


Thank you,
Thomas Ieracitano
Thomas@Ieracitano.com
www.DigitalCarGuy.com
(229) 251-2462
P.S. Are you 'Advertising' or 'Marketing' ?
Ask me the Difference?

Ford Motor announced Wednesday that 85 percent of each Ford vehicle made now is recyclable

Ford Motor announced Wednesday that 85 percent (by weight) of each Ford vehicle made now is recyclable.
Apparently, CEO Bill Ford's misspent youth carousing with "known and suspected environmentalists" back in the day has paid off. And it seems to be the little things that count, according to Ford Motor.
         (Credit: Ford Motor)
In addition to the usual car parts that have been recycled for years, Ford has also been adding sustainable raw materials or recycled materials for components in select cars.
Ford's use of components like splash shields and engine covers made from post-consumer recycled plastics has prevented an estimated 25 million to 30 million pounds of plastic from going into landfills, according to company statistics.
The 2010 Ford Taurus, for example, will be the 11th Ford vehicle to have seat cushions, seatbacks, and headrests made from soy and biomass-based foam. Ford-produced vehicles that already have this include: the Ford Mustang, F-150, Focus, Flex, Escape, Expedition, Econoline, Mercury Mariner, Lincoln MKS, and Lincoln Navigator.
The company is also using seat fabrics made from recycled yarn in the Ford Escape and Escape Hybrid, and in the 2010 Ford Flex the storage bins are made from wheat straw-reinforced plastic. lts goal is to eventually make cars where none of the plastic components are made from petroleum, but from things that are completely compostable.
"Natural fiber-reinforced plastics and plant-based polymer resins help reduce CO2 emissions by being entirely compostable, and in some cases reduce weight, which helps improve fuel economy," Debbie Mielewski, technical leader of Ford Plastics Research, said in a statement.
So, why is Ford suddenly spinning all this oh-we-forgot-to-mention-we've-always-been-environmentalists info now? In addition to it being Earth Day, it could be that Ford is as flabbergasted as the rest of us that the 2010 World Green Car of the Year award went to a green branding program instead of an actual car. Volkswagen won the prestigious car award for its BlueMotion versions of the Golf, Passat, and Polo. BlueMotion is their brand name for the versions of the cars that include extra efficiency technology.
Perhaps Ford is taking it one step further and planning to add sustainable materials into its own green branding of cars.


Thank you,
Thomas Ieracitano
Thomas@Ieracitano.com
www.DigitalCarGuy.com
(229) 251-2462
P.S. Are you 'Advertising' or 'Marketing' ?
Ask me the Difference?

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Monday, April 19, 2010

Haven't we seen this movie before?

Haven't we seen this movie before?


Carmakers bring out a flurry of new small entries in response to a sudden rush of demand driven by spiking gas prices. TV talking heads intone that "gasoline is not going to get any cheaper," but then it does, and U.S. car buyers, whose collective memory is about as long as a snail darter's, revert to form and embrace size and power again.


But it really does seem different this time. While most international auto shows have pushed a green theme recently, at the Detroit auto show in January, it was all about small. Noting the lack of truck and SUV debuts, Audi chief designer Stefan Sielaff said, "I have a feeling that there is a paradigm shift."


With gasoline prices well off their historic highs - which were nearly two years ago - why are carmakers so eagerly jumping on the small-car bandwagon? Well, there are new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards - 35.5 mpg by 2016, although that's not a hard-and-fast figure, as it will vary for each carmaker depending on the size of its vehicles (bigger vehicles get lower standards). More significant is that the slice of the new-vehicle pie taken by small cars has grown by 50 percent over the last five years, and nothing attracts automakers' attention like a growing market.


B- and C-size passenger cars have gone from 14 percent of the market in 2004 to 21 percent in 2009. Sure, they got a boost by the $4-a-gallon gas panic of 2008 (although prices later dipped below $2 in many places by the end of the year) and by "cash for clunkers" in the summer of 2009, but we're still talking about five years of annual market-share growth. Clearly, larger forces are at work.


Baby boomers and the generation aged 15 to 30 are the two biggest demographic groups, and they've both been driving this growth. Boomers, now often empty nesters and entering retirement, are trading down in size. Meanwhile, half of first-time buyers under age thirty are choosing small cars. Another demographic shift favoring small cars is the urbanization of America: in 2009, according to Ford, we saw more people living in cities than in suburban/rural areas.



Thank you,
Thomas Ieracitano
Thomas@Ieracitano.com
www.DigitalCarGuy.com
(229) 251-2462
P.S. Are you 'Advertising' or 'Marketing' ?
Ask me the Difference?

First Drive: 2011 Ford Mustang


God bless the Chevrolet Camaro. If it weren't for the 2009 revival of the General's muscle car, we might still be driving Mustangs saddled with old, underpowered engines. But last year, the Camaro's V-6 was just 11 hp shy of matching the Mustang's V-8 output. Ford had to respond, because Chevrolet hadn't simply won the spec-sheet battle; both six- and eight-cylinder Ford engines were unreasonably crude for duty in anything claiming to be a sports car.

Action comes in the form of two new engines for the 2011 Mustang that pit Blue Oval versus Bowtie as never before. The new 305-hp V-6 rings in exactly one horsepower stronger than the Chevy six-cylinder. It also produces 95 hp more than the outgoing V-6 Mustang. The headliner, however, is a new V-8 that brings back Ford's famous 5.0 badge.

Rollin' in the 5.0
At 412 hp, the 5.0-liter falls short of the 426 hp in a Camaro SS but the Mustang GT also has a 244-pound advantage over the Chevy. Once we are behind the wheel, though, we aren't really inspired to draw comparisons with the Camaro. Rather, we're content to revel in the new mill's flexibility. As a distant relative of the 315-hp 4.6-liter, the 5.0-liter V-8 feels smooth and unrestricted at low rpm and willingly nips the 7000-rpm redline when it's pressed. And pressing it is exactly what you'll want to do, whether you're trying to get somewhere quickly or just destroy your rear tires with smoky burnouts. Tight canyon roads outside Los Angeles highlight the V-8's wide torque band; we leave the stick in second gear while we run from 2000 to 6000 rpm and back repeatedly. Inside the cabin, the exhaust note is a bit soft but the low wub-wub-wub warble has been piped into the cabin with an induction tube and sounds spot on. A sport exhaust, though, would complete the package.

A new V-6, too
While the 5.0 is the big news, the base Mustang actually receives a greater number of significant updates. In addition to the new 3.7-liter engine, the V-6 car now includes a limited-slip differential, a cold-air intake, and dual exhaust as standard equipment. There's also a new performance package, which Ford hopes will appease young enthusiasts who can't afford insurance on a GT. Upgrades include a numerically higher 3.31:1 rear axle, the Mustang GT suspension, a strut-tower brace, nineteen-inch wheels, Pirelli summer tires, and a stability control sport mode. Our V-6 tester didn't have the performance package, but it was equipped with the 3.31:1 final drive as a stand-alone option to deliver more eager acceleration. Yet within a few miles of driving the V-6, we were underwhelmed by the power delivery. The engine is slow to rev and acceleration feels more anemic than you'd expect from 305 hp and 280 lb-ft of torque. Still, it's a much better feel than the crass truck-engine character of the old 4.0-liter. The new engine is better described as a passionless, mainstream wheel-turner. Perhaps that's a function of the 3.7-liter's other duties in the Ford Edge crossover and Lincoln MKS and MKT. Whereas the Camaro led many to say that a V-6 needn't play second fiddle to a V-8, our recommendation for the Mustang is quite the opposite: find a way to get into the V-8.

The transmissions in both base and GT Mustangs have an additional cog over last year's gearbox, totaling six forward gears for automatic and manual units. The experience, though, is largely unchanged from last year's car. The short stick topped with a ball-shaped shifter requires firm throws to move through a tight and notchy pattern that's fitting for a muscle car. The more efficient engines and wider gear spreads result in fuel economy increases across the range. The most frugal V-6, an automatic coupe, returns 19/31 mpg. GTs are rated at 18/25 with the automatic and 17/26 with a manual.

Chassis changes
The switch from hydraulic steering assist to an electromechanical setup also improves fuel economy. Ford uses five different steering calibrations for the Mustang, depending on whether the car is a coupe or convertible, V-6 or V-8, or if it's a GT with the Brembo brake package. We weren't able to sample all five flavors, but we did detect a noticeable difference between a Brembo-equipped GT and the V-6 coupe. In our GT, the steering was so good - so even, precise, and communicative - that it drummed up thoughts of BMWs. The Brembo-package calibration isn't as heavy as the Bavarians would require, but it's just as consistent. The V-6 coupe's steering is also quite good, but it feels marginally overboosted and just slightly vague off center around 30 mph.

With new engines - and the resulting weight changes - engineers had to retune the spring and damper rates. Additionally, they've stiffened the front end with a Z-brace, tweaked anti-roll-bar diameters, and mounted firmer and grippier bushings front and rear. Relocating the mounts for the upper control arms also reduces axle hop during smoky launches. Of course, the Mustang stubbornly continues with its live rear axle, and Ford's best efforts will never conquer physics. The V-6 we drove transitioned between a jarringly stiff ride at low speeds and loose control at higher velocities. The GT, however, was much more constant in its responses and was composed over all but the harshest roads. If the wheels find a calm surface, handling is exceptional, with quick turn-in and flat body control.

Last year's looks
The Mustang received a significant face-lift for the 2010 model year, so the few subtle changes for 2011 (a brighter pony emblem on the GT, for example) are trivial and difficult to spot. Ambitiously - and somewhat oddly - Ford displayed an Audi A5 as the company's chief benchmark for interior quality. The GT features a wide span of genuine aluminum on the dash and attractive leather seating options. However, the Audi bogey is still a bit of a stretch for Ford's utilitarian radio and climate controls and dash plastics. Seat time in the Mustang did reconfirm, though, that the Mustang is the most comfortable and natural of the muscle car trio, with unparalleled visibility and a sporty feeling of compactness.

Mustang prices see modest increases for 2011, but the latest pony is well worth the extra cost. A V-6 coupe now starts at $22,995 including destination. That's up $750 from last year, but still $535 cheaper than a Camaro. V-8-powered GT models start from $30,495 to the Camaro's $31,795.

The good war
The 2011 Mustang delivers quicker acceleration, sharper handling, and a better driving character, yet its best quality may be that it's an agitator. By taking such a direct shot at the Camaro, Ford has forced Chevrolet to return fire. A mild power increase that will put V-6 Camaro output ahead of the Mustang should come soon, and you can bet that's not all Chevy is working on. The war is on, and it's shaping up to be a good one.



Thank you,
Thomas Ieracitano
Thomas@Ieracitano.com
www.DigitalCarGuy.com
(229) 251-2462
P.S. Are you 'Advertising' or 'Marketing' ?
Ask me the Difference?

Monday, April 5, 2010

Are things back to normal?

Edward Lapham
Automotive News -- April 5, 2010 - 12:01 am ET

The March sales numbers made a lot of people in the industry feel pretty darned good last week.

But the nagging unemployment numbers, unenthusiastic consumer spending levels and lack of a strong economic recovery -- plus my razor-sharp skepticism and decades of experience observing sales cycles -- made me doubt that the March sales uptick was the start of a genuine recovery.

So I called an expert -- a salesman for a General Motors dealership. I have known him for years and trust him to give me an unvarnished view of life on the front line selling automobiles.

I asked him, "Are things back to normal?"

The salesman started out by telling me what a great month he'd had. The best month in a long time, he said, reminding me what a good, customer-friendly salesman he is.

But are things back to normal?

Things are better, he said, but not the best they've ever been.

Then he started grumbling. He still can't believe that GM is phasing out the Lucerne. "Do they really want to do without a big Buick?'' he asked, not really expecting an answer.
Are things back to normal? No -- and yes

"We haven't been able to order one for three months," he said, his voice getting louder in the receiver. "You ought to call around and see who has Lucernes. I'll bet nobody does."

Then we drifted to another familiar topic: incentives.

My salesman friend admits that he is befuddled by GM's retail and wholesale incentives, which he says are confusing and counterproductive and make it too difficult to sell cars. He told me he spent several hours last week trying to unravel which incentives a customer was entitled to receive, in the end explaining to her that another dealer was wrong.

Then he marveled at Toyota's incentive pricing. "You call, and they say, 'Here's the price, what color do you want?'" he said. "That's how you sell cars."

Before we hung up we agreed that in some ways, things are back to normal.

Read more:

Thank you,
Thomas Ieracitano
Thomas@Ieracitano.com
www.DigitalCarGuy.com
(229) 251-2462
P.S. Are you 'Advertising' or 'Marketing' ?
Ask me the Difference?